Stop the war!Остановите войну!
for scientists:
default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDLearned Publishing, Volume 35
Volume 35, Number 1, January 2022
- Lettie Y. Conrad
, Richard Delahunty, Wendy Ding:
The promise and the future of research data sharing. 4-6
- Qingyu Duan, Xiaoguang Wang, Ningyuan Song:
Reuse-oriented data publishing: How to make the shared research data friendlier for researchers. 7-15 - Marie-Emilia Herbet, Jérémie Léonard, Maria Grazia Santangelo, Lucie Albaret:
Dissimulate or disseminate? A survey on the fate of negative results. 16-29 - Yu Wang, Beibei Chen, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng:
Research data policies of journals in the Chinese Science Citation Database based on the language, publisher, discipline, access model and metrics. 30-45 - Chengzan Li, Yuanchun Zhou, Xiaohuan Zheng, Zeyu Zhang, Lulu Jiang, Zongwen Li, Pengyao Wang, Jianhui Li, Songyuan Xu, Zhanjie Wang:
Tracing the footsteps of open research data in China. 46-55 - Matthew Cannon, Andrew Kelly, Chris Freeman:
Implementing an Open & FAIR data sharing policy - A case study in the earth and environmental sciences. 56-66
- Eefke Smit, Joris van Rossum:
STM's Research Data Year: Results, lessons learnt, and next steps. 67-70
- Aki MacFarlane:
The importance of effective data sharing and reuse to funders and others supporting research. 71-74 - Helena Cousijn, Ted Habermann, Elizabeth Krznarich, Alice Meadows:
Beyond data: Sharing related research outputs to make data reusable. 75-80 - Catriona Manville, Grace Melvin:
The importance of transparency and openness in research data to drive patient benefit - Examples from the United Kingdom. 81-85
- Thanking our reviewers 2021. 86-87
Volume 35, Number 2, April 2022
- Guijie Zhang, Fangfang Wei, Peixin Wang, Yikai Liang:
Investigating academic conference publications from provincial administrative regions in the mainland of China. 92-104 - Jirí Kratochvíl, Helga Abrahámová, Marta Fialová, Martina Stodulková:
Citation rules through the eyes of biomedical journal editors. 105-117 - Ramón A. Feenstra, Emilio Delgado López-Cózar:
Philosophers' perceptions of pay to publish and open access in Spain: Books versus journals, more than a financial dilemma. 118-129 - Henk F. Moed, Carmen López-Illescas, Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote, Félix de Moya Anegón:
Journals in Beall's list perform as a group less well than other open access journals indexed in Scopus but reveal large differences among publishers. 130-139 - Adam Coates:
Academic journals' usernames and the threat of fraudulent accounts on social media. 140-148 - Yan Lei:
Is a journal's ranking related to the reviewer's academic impact? (An empirical study based on Publons). 149-162 - Bei Zhang, Jing Sun, Huangqun Zhang, Chengting Xu:
Can promotion on WeChat official accounts improve scholarly journals' academic impact? A micro-level correlation comparison study. 163-174 - Moumita Koley, Kanchan Lala:
Are journal archiving and embargo policies impeding the success of India's open access policy? 175-186 - Mahdi Khelfaoui, Yves Gingras:
Expanding Nature: Product line and brand extensions of a scientific journal. 187-197 - Hamid R. Jamali, Simon Wakeling, Alireza Abbasi:
Scholarly journal publishing in Australia. 198-208 - Mei Zhang:
University press selection of e-book vendors for US academic libraries: Why work with X but not Y? 209-218 - Hamid R. Jamali, Simon Wakeling, Alireza Abbasi:
Why do journals discontinue? A study of Australian ceased journals. 219-228 - Gert Helgesson, Igor Radun, Jenni Radun, Gustav Nilsonne:
Editors publishing in their own journals: A systematic review of prevalence and a discussion of normative aspects. 229-240 - Ruth Fairclough, Mike Thelwall:
Questionnaires mentioned in academic research 1996-2019: Rapid increase but declining citation impact. 241-252 - Lili Yang, Siyun Xu, Jufang Shao, Panzhi Wang, Xianjun Wang, Qi Qi, Rongwang Yang:
Declaration of conflict of interest in medical researchers: A cross-sectional study from China. 253-260 - Shaoxiong (Brian) Xu, Guangwei Hu:
Non-author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross-disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction. 261-270
- Carlo Galli, Maria Teresa Colangelo, Stefano Guizzardi:
Linguistic changes in the transition from summaries to abstracts: The case of the Journal of Experimental Medicine. 271-284
- Anthony F. Jorm:
Publons as a source of high volume, poorly targeted reviewer requests: The need for better standards of practice by publishers. 285-287 - Jean-Pierre V. M. Hérubel:
For alma mater: Publishing institutional histories of higher education and university presses: Purposes, genre and scholarly value. 288-291 - Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Quan-Hoang Vuong:
Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness. 292-299
Volume 35, Number 3, July 2022
Editorials
- Sophie Robinson:
Guest editorial: An early career editor's perspective on the themed collection. 304-305 - Max Steuer, Rafael Plancarte-Escobar:
Towards improved understanding of students and junior scholars as authors, reviewers, editors and leaders in scholarly publishing. 306-307
- Xiaoguang Wang, Lingying Xia, Qingyu Duan:
The barriers and informational needs of students and junior researchers when reading scientific papers. 308-320 - Kari A. Mattison, Andrea R. Merchak, Scott T. Wieman, Stephanie Zimmer, Sarah C. Fankhauser:
Engaging young scholars in science through publication: A survey analysis of published middle and high school authors. 321-331 - Maria S. Plakhotnik:
Co-authoring with undergraduate students: An emerging process from the semi-periphery of the world of science. 332-340 - Daniel Stockemer, Theresa Reidy, Antonia Teodoro, Guy Gerba:
Student publishing in peer reviewed journals: Evidence from the International Political Science Review. 341-349 - Yu Wang, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng, Mengyao Cheng:
Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China. 350-360
- Gregory Stiles, Janina Pescinski, Katharine Petrich, Anastasia Ufimtseva:
For early-career researchers by early-career researchers: The GPNG model for advancing, promoting and supporting innovative research. 361-366 - Aishwarya Pagedar, Sanskriti Sanghi, Shivangi Gangwar:
Nurturing an 'ethic of collaboration': Dispatches from a case study on Jindal Global Law Review. 367-375 - Wilson Lui:
Advancing the student-oriented model of academic publishing: The case of legal studies in Hong Kong. 376-384 - Rafael Plancarte-Escobar, Max Steuer:
Junior journals in politics and international relations: Potential and challenges. 385-392 - Claire E. Otero, Victoria Osinski, Kari A. Mattison:
The untapped potential of early career researchers in academic publishing: Lessons learned from the Journal of Emerging Investigators model. 393-399
- Ales Karmazin:
Editing a journal at the semiperiphery: Ambivalence of juniority and meaningfulness of publishing. 400-404 - Gary S. McDowell, Sarah C. Fankhauser, Daniela Saderi, Meena Balgopal, Rebeccah S. Lijek:
Use of preprint peer review to educate and enculturate science undergraduates. 405-412 - Ryan S. C. Wong, Kayla M. Martensen:
Let's start talking: A reflective essay on minority students' experiences in academic spaces, publishing, and journal involvement. 413-417 - Quan-Hoang Vuong:
The editor: A demanding but underestimated role in scientific publishing. 418-422 - Phillip Nelson, Marina G. Petrova:
Research assistants: Scientific credit and recognized authorship. 423-427
Volume 35, Number 4, October 2022
- Pippa Smart:
The past, present and future of publishing: Observations to celebrate ALPSP's 50th year. 432-440
- Jaume Sureda-Negre, Aina Calvo-Sastre, Rubén Comas-Forgas:
Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences. 441-447 - Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Yves Fassin:
Reflection on the Springer Nature initial public offering attempts in an evolving academic publishing market. 448-453 - Marie-Dominique Heusse, Guillaume Cabanac:
ORCID growth and field-wise dynamics of adoption: A case study of the Toulouse scientific area. 454-466 - Lin Zhang, Yahui Wei, Gunnar Sivertsen, Ying Huang:
The motivations and criteria behind China's list of questionable journals. 467-480 - Jonathan Roscoe:
The need for accelerated change in diversity, equity and inclusion in publishing and learned societies. 481-488 - Francisco Segado-Boj, Juan José Prieto-Gutierrez, Juan Martin-Quevedo:
Attitudes, willingness, and resources to cover article publishing charges: The influence of age, position, income level country, discipline and open access habits. 489-498 - Serhii Nazarovets:
Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus-delisted titles. 499-515 - Tracey Elliott, Bisma Fazeen, Asfawossen Asrat, Ana Maria Cetto, Stefan Eriksson, Lai-Meng Looi, Diane Negra:
Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences: A global survey of researchers. 516-528 - Stephen J. Chapman, Fahima Dossa, E. Joline de Groof, Celia Keane, Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst, Neil J. Smart:
The AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool and editorial decision-making for systematic reviews: Retrospective, bibliometric study. 529-538 - Kamila Augustyn:
An analysis of publishing studies journals: An insight into the structure of the field based on publications. 539-562 - Yulia V. Sevryugina, Andrew J. Dicks:
Publication practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Expedited publishing or simply an early bird effect? 563-573 - Hassan Nejadghanbar, Guangwei Hu:
Where predatory and mainstream journals differ: A study of language and linguistics journals. 574-584 - Xiaohua Jiang, Yabing Shi:
Editorial bias in top-tier education journals: Factors influencing publishable scholarship in China. 585-597 - Tove Faber Frandsen:
Authors publishing repeatedly in predatory journals: An analysis of Scopus articles. 598-604 - David Nicholas, Eti Herman, David J. Clark, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Abdullah Abrizah, Anthony Watkinson, Jie Xu, David Sims, Galina Serbina, Marzena Swigon, Hamid R. Jamali, Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard:
Choosing the 'right' journal for publication: Perceptions and practices of pandemic-era early career researchers. 605-616 - Majid Nabavi:
An analysis of journalism articles achieving high Altmetric attention scores. 617-624 - Ningyuan Song, Jing Liu, Xiaoguang Wang, Qingyu Duan, Mengjuan Weng:
Chinese humanities scholars' reading of academic E-books: A survey on reading strategies and tasks. 625-639 - Luka Ursic, Danijel Gudelj, Vicko Tomic, Matko Marusic, Ana Marusic:
Analysing overlay journals: The state-of-the-art in 2021 and possible perspectives. 640-649
- T. Scott Plutchak, H. Frederick Dylla, Crispin Taylor, John Vaughn:
Public access policy in the United States: Impact of the Scholarly Publishing Roundtable. 650-657 - Maryna Nazarovets, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva:
Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo-Ukrainian war. 658-670
- Nick Rushby:
A parallel universe: Challenges for an international journal based in Russia. 671-673 - Jean Iwaz:
To my reviewers, with respect and gratitude: Guidelines from an author. 674-677 - William H. Walters:
Scholarly journals are sometimes regarded as substitutes even though each provides unique content. 678-681
- Award. 682-683
a service of 
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2023-06-03 02:28 CEST by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
