"PCS-16QAM vs QPSK: What is the best choice for Next-Generation Long-Haul 400G?"

Abel Lorences-Riesgo et al. (2021)

> Home

Details and statistics

DOI: 10.1109/ECOC52684.2021.9606133

access: closed

type: Conference or Workshop Paper

metadata version: 2021-12-01

- view
  - electronic edition via DOI
  - unpaywalled version
  authority control:
- export record
  dblp key:
  - conf/ecoc/Lorences-Riesgo21
- ask others
- share record
  persistent URL:
  - https://dblp.org/rec/conf/ecoc/Lorences-Riesgo21
Abel Lorences-Riesgo, Djalal-Falih Bendimerad, K. Le-Trung, Ivan Fernandez de Jauregui Ruiz, Yu Zhao, Martí Sales-Llopis, S. Kamel, K. Huang, Celestino Sanches Martins, Dylan Le Gac, Sami Mumtaz, Stefanos Dris, Yann Frignac, Gabriel Charlet:
PCS-16QAM vs QPSK: What is the best choice for Next-Generation Long-Haul 400G? ECOC 2021: 1-4

manage site settings

To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.