Stop the war!Остановите войну!
for scientists:
default search action
Google
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
Internet Archive Scholar
CiteSeerX
ORCIDReasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse 2015
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse, Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Argumentation Library 27, Springer 2015, ISBN 978-3-319-20954-8
Argumentation Theory as a Discipline
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Sally Jackson, Scott Jacobs:
Argumentation. 3-25 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Language of Argumentation in Dutch. 27-30 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. 31-53 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory. 55-77
The Pragma-Dialectical Research Program
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
Argumentation Studies' Five Estates. 81-109 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. 111-125 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. 127-147 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
The Case of Pragma-Dialectics. 149-179 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion. 181-200
The Dialectical Dimension of Pragma-Dialectics
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 203-221 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
In Reasonableness. 223-244 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
A Procedural View of Critical Reasonableness. 245-252 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion. 253-271
The Pragmatic Dimension of Pragma-Dialectics
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Viewing the Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics. 275-296 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussions. 297-318 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues. 319-329 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
For Reason's Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse. 331-345
Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. 349-379 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Strategic Maneuvering: Examining Argumentation in Context. 381-401 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Rhetoric in a Dialectical Framework: Fallacies as Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring. 403-423 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof. 425-442 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Seizing the Occasion: Parameters for Analysing Ways of Strategic Manoeuvring. 443-454 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof. 455-465
Analysis as Reconstruction
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse with the Help of Speech Act Conditions. 469-485 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Analyzing Argumentative Discourse. 487-506 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Analysis and Evaluation of Argumentative Discourse. 507-519 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation. 521-542 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Making the Best of Argumentative Discourse. 543-554
Fallacies in Argumentative Discourse
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 557-574 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment. 575-594 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Linguistic Criteria for Judging Composition and Division Fallacies. 595-609 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
The History of the Argumentum Ad Hominem Since the Seventeenth Century. 611-629 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
How to Respond to Fallacious Moves? 631-641
Various Theoretical Issues
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
In Context Giving Contextualization Its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation. 645-666 - Frans H. van Eemeren:
The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation. 667-680 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans:
Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves. 681-702 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Tjark Kruiger:
Identifying Argumentation Schemes. 703-712 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst:
From Analysis to Presentation: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Writing Argumentative Texts. 713-729
Experimental Research Concerning Argumentation
- Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Bert Meuffels:
The Skill of Identifying Argumentation. 733-741 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Kees de Glopper, Rob Grootendorst, Ron Oostdam:
Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes. 743-757 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted. 759-771 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
Effectiveness Through Reasonableness: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. 773-793 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
The Disguised abusive ad hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Maneuvering with Direct Personal Attacks. 795-813 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Bert Meuffels:
The Disguised ad baculum Fallacy Empirically Investigated. Strategic Maneuvering with Threats. 815-826
Case Studies
- Frans H. van Eemeren:
Democracy and Argumentation. 829-843 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
In Varietate Concordia - United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type. 845-860 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen:
Exploiting the Room for Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse Dealing with Audience Demand in the European Parliament. 861-874 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
Flexible Facts: A Pragma-Dialectical Analysis of a Burden of Proof Manipulation. 875-882 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
William the Silent's Argumentative Discourse. 883-891 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser:
The Rhetoric of William the Silent's Apologie a Dialectical Perspective. 893-900 - Frans H. van Eemeren, Kees de Glopper, Rob Grootendorst, Ron Oostdam:
Erratum to: Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes.
a service of 
manage site settings
To protect your privacy, all features that rely on external API calls from your browser are turned off by default. You need to opt-in for them to become active. All settings here will be stored as cookies with your web browser. For more information see our F.A.Q.
last updated on 2024-07-27 17:43 CEST by the dblp team
all metadata released as open data under CC0 1.0 license
see also: Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Imprint
dblp was originally created in 1993 at:
since 2018, dblp has been operated and maintained by:
the dblp computer science bibliography is funded and supported by:
